Re: [Mesa-dev] [Intel-gfx] gitlab.fd.o financial situation and impact on services

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 3:47 PM Timur Kristóf <timur.kristof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 14:46 -0500, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> > >
> > > 1. I think we should completely disable running the CI on MRs which
> > > are
> > > marked WIP. Speaking from personal experience, I usually make a lot
> > > of
> > > changes to my MRs before they are merged, so it is a waste of CI
> > > resources.
> >
> > In the mean time, you can help by taking the habit to use:
> >
> >   git push -o ci.skip
>
> Thanks for the advice, I wasn't aware such an option exists. Does this
> also work on the mesa gitlab or is this a GStreamer only thing?

Mesa is already set up so that it only runs on MRs and branches named
ci-* (or maybe it's ci/*; I can't remember).

> How hard would it be to make this the default?

I strongly suggest looking at how Mesa does it and doing that in
GStreamer if you can.  It seems to work pretty well in Mesa.

--Jason


> > That's a much more difficult goal then it looks like. Let each
> > projects
> > manage their CI graph and content, as each case is unique. Running
> > more
> > tests, or building more code isn't the main issue as the CPU time is
> > mostly sponsored. The data transfers between the cloud of gitlab and
> > the runners (which are external), along to sending OS image to Lava
> > labs is what is likely the most expensive.
> >
> > As it was already mention in the thread, what we are missing now, and
> > being worked on, is per group/project statistics that give us the
> > hotspot so we can better target the optimization work.
>
> Yes, would be nice to know what the hotspot is, indeed.
>
> As far as I understand, the problem is not CI itself, but the bandwidth
> needed by the build artifacts, right? Would it be possible to not host
> the build artifacts on the gitlab, but rather only the place where the
> build actually happened? Or at least, only transfer the build artifacts
> on-demand?
>
> I'm not exactly familiar with how the system works, so sorry if this is
> a silly question.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux