Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: disable gfxoff when using register read interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Xiaojie,

could you add that test to the unit tests we have in libdrm?

Would be rather nice to have,
Christian.

Am 18.11.19 um 15:09 schrieb Yuan, Xiaojie:
Hi Alex,

I tried on Navi14 with Gfxoff enabled (gfx in 'OFF' state when I run the test program) and used a test program to read GRBM_STATUS/CP_STAT/GB_ADDR_CONFIG via DRM_IOCTL_AMDGPU_INFO.

All read out values are valid as below (in this read cycle, I saw gfx block is first awakened and then powered off again automatically):

drm version: 3.36.0
grbm_status: 0x00003028
cp_stat: 0x00000000
gb_addr_config: 0x00000043

At least for Navi, reading register when gfxoff seems not a problem...

Test program:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <libdrm/drm.h>
#include <libdrm/amdgpu_drm.h>

int get_reg_val(int fd, int reg_offset, int *val)
{
         struct drm_amdgpu_info request;
         int r;

         memset(&request, 0, sizeof(request));
         request.return_pointer = (uintptr_t)val;
         request.return_size = sizeof(uint32_t);
         request.query = AMDGPU_INFO_READ_MMR_REG;
         request.read_mmr_reg.dword_offset = reg_offset;
         request.read_mmr_reg.count = 1;
         request.read_mmr_reg.instance = 0xffffffff;
         request.read_mmr_reg.flags = 0;

         r = ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_AMDGPU_INFO, &request);
         if (r < 0) {
                 perror("failed to read register");
                 return -errno;
         }

         return 0;
}

int main(int argc, const char *argv[])
{
         const char *device = "/dev/dri/card0";
         int fd;
         int r;
         struct drm_version version;
         struct drm_auth auth;
         int cp_stat;
         int grbm_status;
         int gb_addr_config;

         fd = open(device, O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC);
         if (fd < 0) {
                 perror("failed to open device\n");
                 return -errno;
         }

         memset(&version, 0, sizeof(version));

         r = ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_VERSION, &version);
         if (r < 0) {
                 perror("failed to get drm version");
                 r = -errno;
                 goto close;
         }

         printf("drm version: %d.%d.%d\n", version.version_major,
                                           version.version_minor,
                                           version.version_patchlevel);

         r = get_reg_val(fd, 0x2004, &grbm_status);
         if (r < 0)
                 goto close;
         printf("grbm_status: 0x%08x\n", grbm_status);

         r = get_reg_val(fd, 0x21a0, &cp_stat);
         if (r < 0)
                 goto close;
         printf("cp_stat: 0x%08x\n", cp_stat);

         r = get_reg_val(fd, 0x263e, &gb_addr_config);
         if (r < 0)
                 goto close;
         printf("gb_addr_config: 0x%08x\n", gb_addr_config);

close:
         close(fd);

         return r;
}

BR,
Xiaojie

________________________________________
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Yuan, Xiaojie <Xiaojie.Yuan@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2019 1:02 AM
To: Alex Deucher
Cc: Deucher, Alexander; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: disable gfxoff when using register read interface

Yes. IIRC, some asics' amdgpu_gfx_ctrl() is implemented as synchronous (upon function returns, gfx block is guaranteed to be in power-up state). Anyway, let me confirm about that soon.

BR,
Xiaojie

On Nov 16, 2019, at 12:52 AM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 11:46 AM Yuan, Xiaojie <Xiaojie.Yuan@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Alex,

IMHO, driver sending Disallow_Gfxoff message to SMU doesn't mean gfx block will be immediately powered up, so I'm not sure MMIO register access will be successful within this time window(maybe GRBM access will be pending until gfx block is powered up?)

If you are not in a hurry to commit this fix, I can verify on my Navi boards next Monday.
That would be great.  Maybe we can add a delay in that function to
take that into account?

Thanks!

Alex

BR,
Xiaojie

On Nov 15, 2019, at 12:44 AM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

When gfxoff is enabled, accessing gfx registers via MMIO
can lead to a hang.

Bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205497
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
index 6ddea7607ad0..5f3b3a705b29 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
@@ -659,15 +659,19 @@ static int amdgpu_info_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file
           return -ENOMEM;
       alloc_size = info->read_mmr_reg.count * sizeof(*regs);

-        for (i = 0; i < info->read_mmr_reg.count; i++)
+        amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, false);
+        for (i = 0; i < info->read_mmr_reg.count; i++) {
           if (amdgpu_asic_read_register(adev, se_num, sh_num,
                             info->read_mmr_reg.dword_offset + i,
                             &regs[i])) {
               DRM_DEBUG_KMS("unallowed offset %#x\n",
                         info->read_mmr_reg.dword_offset + i);
               kfree(regs);
+                amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, true);
               return -EFAULT;
           }
+        }
+        amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, true);
       n = copy_to_user(out, regs, min(size, alloc_size));
       kfree(regs);
       return n ? -EFAULT : 0;
--
2.23.0

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux