On 2018-07-24 02:47 PM, Christian König wrote: > Am 23.07.2018 um 18:50 schrieb Michel Dänzer: >> On 2018-07-19 05:39 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: >>> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com> >>> >>> The warning turned out to be not so useful, as BO destruction tends to >>> be deferred to a workqueue. >>> >>> Also, we should be preventing any damage from this now, so not really >>> important anymore to fix code doing this. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com> >>> --- >>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 2 +- >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c >>> index b12526ce1a9d..3010f0136de9 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c >>> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static void amdgpu_ttm_bo_destroy(struct >>> ttm_buffer_object *tbo) >>>      struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(tbo->bdev); >>>      struct amdgpu_bo *bo = ttm_to_amdgpu_bo(tbo); >>>  -   if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bo->pin_count > 0)) >>> +   if (bo->pin_count > 0) >>>          amdgpu_bo_subtract_pin_size(bo); >>>       if (bo->kfd_bo) >>> >> Any feedback? > > I'm a bit torn on that. On the one hand the backtrace at this point is > not very useful, but on the other hand it would still be nice to have a > warning. > > Maybe reduce it to a DRM_ERROR()? I don't see that being useful; we'd still get reports about the errors, but couldn't do anything about them. Anyway, since the patch was on the list since last Thursday, I pushed it this morning with Alex's review (thanks!). -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer