[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Don't warn on destroying a pinned BO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 23.07.2018 um 18:50 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> On 2018-07-19 05:39 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com>
>>
>> The warning turned out to be not so useful, as BO destruction tends to
>> be deferred to a workqueue.
>>
>> Also, we should be preventing any damage from this now, so not really
>> important anymore to fix code doing this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>> index b12526ce1a9d..3010f0136de9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static void amdgpu_ttm_bo_destroy(struct ttm_buffer_object *tbo)
>>   	struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(tbo->bdev);
>>   	struct amdgpu_bo *bo = ttm_to_amdgpu_bo(tbo);
>>   
>> -	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bo->pin_count > 0))
>> +	if (bo->pin_count > 0)
>>   		amdgpu_bo_subtract_pin_size(bo);
>>   
>>   	if (bo->kfd_bo)
>>
> Any feedback?

I'm a bit torn on that. On the one hand the backtrace at this point is 
not very useful, but on the other hand it would still be nice to have a 
warning.

Maybe reduce it to a DRM_ERROR()?

Christian.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux