force app kill patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



*Correctio for the scenario *

After we move fence_put(entity->last_sched) out of the fini_status check:


A potential race issue for the scenario:


1.        Drm_sched_entity_fini(): it exit right after entity->job_queue empty, [ but that time scheduler is not fast enough to deal with this entity now ]

2.        Drm_sched_entity_cleanup() : it call dma_fence_put(entity->last_scheduled)  [ but this time entity->last_scheduled  actually points to the fence prior to the real last one ]

3.        Scheduler_main() now dealing with this entity: it call dma_fence_put(entity->last_scheduled)    [   Now this fence get double put !!!  ]

4.        Scheduler_main() now call dma_fence_get() on the *real* last one !

So eventually the real last one fence triggers memory leak and more critical the double put fence cause NULL pointer access

/Monk

From: Liu, Monk
Sent: 2018å¹´4æ??18æ?¥ 15:11
To: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>; Deng, Emily <Emily.Deng at amd.com>
Cc: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: force app kill patch

Hi Christian & Emily

I think the v4 fix for â??fix force app kill hangâ?? is still not good enough:


First:
See that in â??sched_entity_finiâ??, we only call dma_fence_put(entity->last_scheduledâ?? under the condition of â??If (entity->fini_status)â??, so
This way there is memory leak for the case of â??entity->fini_stats ==0â??


Second:
If we move dma_fence_put(entity->last_scheduled) out of the condition of â??if (entity->fini_status)â??, the memory leak issue can be fixed
But there will be kernel NULL pointer access, I think the time you call dma_fence_put(entity->last_scheduledâ??) may actually executed *not*
On the last scheduled fence of this entity, because it is run without â??thread_park/unparkâ?? pair which to make sure scheduler not dealing this entity

So with certain race issue, here is the scenario:


1.        scheduler is doing the dma_fence_put() on the 1st fence,

2.        scheduler set entity->last_scheduled to 1st fence

3.        now sched_entity_fini() run, and it call dma_fence_put() on entity->last_scheduled

4.        now this 1st fence is actually put double time and the real last fence wonâ??t get put by expected


any idea?


/Monk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20180418/c8b33ffe/attachment.html>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux