On 2017å¹´09æ??14æ?¥ 10:33, Dave Airlie wrote: >> But think a bit more, if not by default, that isn't meaningful, we can >> continue to use seq_no base fence and Marek's syncfile fd approach. >> > At least for radv I've no interest in every CS ioctl returning an fd > that I have to > close. OK, let's pend it now. It doesn't matter. Regards, David Zhou > > Dave.
