Could you describe how difficult to directly use CS syncfile fd in Mesa compared with concerting CS seq to syncfile fd via several syncobj ioctls? Regards, David Zhou å??è?ªå??æ?? Pro Marek Ol?é?? <maraeo at gmail.com> äº? 2017å¹´9æ??13æ?¥ ä¸?å??6:11å??é??ï¼? On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:03 AM, zhoucm1 <david1.zhou at amd.com> wrote: > Hi Marek, > > You're doing same things with me, see my "introduce syncfile as fence > reuturn" patch set, which makes things more simple, we just need to directly > return syncfile fd to UMD when CS, then the fence UMD get will be always > syncfile fd, UMD don't need to construct ip_type/ip_instance/ctx_id/ring any > more, which also can pass to dependency and syncobj as well. For simpler Mesa code, Mesa won't get a sync file from the CS ioctl. Marek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20170913/17a8866b/attachment-0001.html>
