Re: [PATCH] drm/amd: Add the capability to mark certain firmware as "required"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 12:47 AM Lazar, Lijo <lijo.lazar@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/4/2024 10:44 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> >
> >>> +enum amdgpu_ucode_required {
> >>> +    AMDGPU_UCODE_NOT_REQUIRED,
> >>> +    AMDGPU_UCODE_REQUIRED,
> >>
> >> Couldn't this be handled in another API instead of having to flag every
> >> load? By default, every ucode is required and if optional may be skipped
> >> with amdgpu_ucode_request_optional() API?
> >>
> >
> > I guess this would be a smaller patch, but 6 eggs one hand, half dozen
> > in the other?
> >
>
> I thought only ISP and gpu_info (no longer there for newer SOCs) fall
> into the optional ones so far. The usage is rare, similar to the
> nowarn() API usage.
>
> Also, as far as I know, the cap microcode is a must whenever used. That
> is not optional.
>

The cap firmware is definitely optional.  Some customers use it, some don't.

Alex


> Thanks,
> Lijo
>
> > Alex - what's your take?
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux