Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 08.05.24 um 12:17 schrieb Michel Dänzer: > > Does this instead of your patch help by any chance? > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c > > index 109fe557a02b..29c197c00018 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c > > @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ bool amdgpu_res_cpu_visible(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > > > > amdgpu_res_first(res, 0, res->size, &cursor); > > while (cursor.remaining) { > > - if ((cursor.start + cursor.size) >= adev->gmc.visible_vram_size) > > + if ((cursor.start + cursor.size) > adev->gmc.visible_vram_size) > > Oh, good catch. Yes that might be it. Yes, that does it. Thanks!