On 16/08/17 09:35 AM, Felix Kuehling wrote: > On 2017-08-15 06:20 AM, Oded Gabbay wrote: >> I prefer to do it incrementally, to avoid very large patch-sets which >> usually end up in longer cycles of review-fix, which causes you more >> pain because internal development continues during this time and you >> need to keep everything synchronized. If you do it in small pieces, >> there is more chance it will get to upstream faster and then you can >> cross it off your list permanently and no longer worry about it not >> being synchronized with internal development. >> >> If you are talking about the current patch-set (you actually sent 2 >> patch-sets), then once you rebase them on the branches I mentioned, >> they are more or less good to go (except from very small fixes we >> talked about). If you can do it during this week, I think we can make >> it for the 4.14 merge window. >> >> Does that make sense ? > > Sounds good. I'm hoping to get a bit more into 4.14. We'll see how it > goes. I've probably been told before but forgot: What's Dave Airlie's > deadline for accepting patches into 4.14? The deadline is usually around -rc6 of the previous cycle, so for 4.14 it might be the end of this week (keep in mind that Dave's in Australia, so his work day is over when yours starts). -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
