On 2017-08-15 06:20 AM, Oded Gabbay wrote: > I prefer to do it incrementally, to avoid very large patch-sets which > usually end up in longer cycles of review-fix, which causes you more > pain because internal development continues during this time and you > need to keep everything synchronized. If you do it in small pieces, > there is more chance it will get to upstream faster and then you can > cross it off your list permanently and no longer worry about it not > being synchronized with internal development. > > If you are talking about the current patch-set (you actually sent 2 > patch-sets), then once you rebase them on the branches I mentioned, > they are more or less good to go (except from very small fixes we > talked about). If you can do it during this week, I think we can make > it for the 4.14 merge window. > > Does that make sense ? Sounds good. I'm hoping to get a bit more into 4.14. We'll see how it goes. I've probably been told before but forgot: What's Dave Airlie's deadline for accepting patches into 4.14? BTW, thanks for your prompt feedback on these patches. I hope you're getting paid for this work, cause there is a lot more coming. ;) I really appreciate it. Regards, Felix > > Oded
