Good evening, I'd like to know how we should proceed about reporting bug on a development branch like drm-next-4.9-si. I've been able to build the branch without problem and even launch Xorg using its modesetting driver. However, there are some visual problems I'd like to report and/or track with people working on bringing GCN 1.0 (and 1.1) to the amdgpu driver (I'm able to compare the result of using radeon+modesetting VS amdgpu+modesetting to put aside bugs that could be related to modesetting itself). Cheers Alexandre Demers On 2016-08-01 17:14, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Alexandre Demers > <alexandre.f.demers at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Alex, >> >> I'd like to know if there is any chance to see a merge / pull request for >> the SI code from drm-next-4.8-wip-si into mainline kernel for 4.8? Nothing >> seems to have been added to the branch since the end of May. I haven't seen >> any thing merged from that branch into drm-next-4.8(-wip) either. What is >> its status? Is it considered completed and ready for merge / test / tune up? >> >> As you know, I'm interested in helping on the task. However, I stopped any >> work on porting SI to amdgpu when I learned someone at AMD was working on >> it. It would have been too long for me to do it in comparison. Now, if I can >> be of any help, let me know, my R9 280X is waiting for some tests. > I just pushed an updated branch for 4.9: > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-4.9-si > > Alex > >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Alexandre Demers >> >> _______________________________________________ >> amd-gfx mailing list >> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
