On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 05:37:46 +0100, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > @@ -1965,12 +1968,6 @@ static void soc_cleanup_card_resources(struct snd_soc_card *card) > { > struct snd_soc_dai_link *link, *_link; > > - /* free the ALSA card at first; this syncs with pending operations */ > - if (card->snd_card) { > - snd_card_free(card->snd_card); > - card->snd_card = NULL; > - } > - > /* remove and free each DAI */ > soc_remove_link_dais(card); > soc_remove_link_components(card); > @@ -1988,6 +1985,11 @@ static void soc_cleanup_card_resources(struct snd_soc_card *card) > /* remove the card */ > if (card->remove) > card->remove(card); > + > + if (card->snd_card) { > + snd_card_free(card->snd_card); > + card->snd_card = NULL; > + } This will likely break unbind again; when unbind is performed in a busy state, the code may release still-in-use resources. The rcar driver seems to have its own disconnect_sync() call so it'd work even with this change, but others wouldn't. At least you need to call snd_card_disconnect_sync() at the first place, then release the rest at the second place. thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel