Hi Pierre-Louis, again > > Morimoto-san, this patch seems to introduce a regression in our SOF > > module removal tests. Without a couple of load/unload modules cycles, > > we hit a kernel oops while freeing the card. > > > > see https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues/1466 for some logs. > > > > This issue did not happen with our November 6 rebase on Mark's tree, > > and showed up today. I couldn't really bisect the whole tree due to > > other issues, so manually applied your patches on top of this 11/06 > > tree and bisected from there. > > > > I will need to confirm this finding (it's quite late for me) but > > looking at the code I wonder if the move of pcm_runtime deletion is > > correct? > > Hmm... > It is just merged verbose 2 functions into 1, > nothing changed from logic point of view > if my understanding was correct. > > And now, I tried unbind test for cpu/codec/card on my side, > but nothing happen... > > I'm using this commit > > bc7a9091e5b927ecc20dbb3bc07a5a09783fc27b > ("ASoC: soc-core: add soc_unbind_dai_link()") Does it happen from soc-topology.c :: remove_link ? Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
