Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] ASoC: dt-bindings: add dt bindings for WCD9340/WCD9341 audio codec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 05/11/2019 19:08, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:55 AM Srinivas Kandagatla
<srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On 29/10/2019 20:47, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 7:45 AM Srinivas Kandagatla
<srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On 28/10/2019 12:40, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
Its Phandle.

something like this is okay?

slim-ifc-dev:
     $ref: '/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array'

Sorry this should not be an array, so something like this:

     slim-ifc-dev:
       description: SLIMBus Interface device phandle

You're just spelling out the abbreviated name. I can do that much.
What is 'SLIMBus Interface device'?

Each SLIMBus Component contains one Interface Device. Which is
responsible for Monitoring and reporting the status of component, Data
line to Data pin connection setup for SLIMBus streaming. Interface
device is enumerated just like any other slim device.

So a standard set of registers every slimbus device has? In hindsight,
I would have made reg have 2 entries with both addresses. I guess that
ship has sailed.

That will break SLIMBus bindings, Which is expecting one device per device node.


It seems strange you would need both "devices" described as separate
nodes in DT.

Because they are two different devices on the SLIMBus Component.



We already have exactly same bindings for WCD9335 in upstream at:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,wcd9335.txt?h=v5.4-rc5#n42


Is it a standard SLIMBus property? If so, document it in the right
place. If not, then needs a vendor prefix.

"SLIMBus Interface Device" itself is documented in SLIMBus Specification.

If I remember it correctly You suggested me to move to "slim-ifc-dev"
as this is part of SLIMBus Specification.

Probably so. If it is common, then document it in bindings/slimbus/bus.txt.

As we are dealing with audio codecs here, it might be that "slim-ifc-dev" is common across wcd9335 and wcd934x but not all devices on the SLIMBus Component would need handle to interface device. SLIMbus can also be used for control buses as well which might not need this.


Then here, 'slim-ifc-dev: true' is sufficient. You can just assume we
convert bus.txt to schema (or feel free to do that :) ).

We need phandle to the interface device so that we can program the streaming parameters for the SLIMBus Component.


--srini



Rob

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux