On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 04:14:49PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote: > AFAIK, the revert is safe. We can keep the codec this way if it is ok > with you. IMO, it is simpler that way Let's just do the revert, at least initially, so it can be backported simply. > I can also submit a follow-up to use a mutex in a safer/cleaner way (mutex > + busy flag) if you prefer. That'd definitely be worth looking at, both for the extra safety and in case we discover on review that the revert is causing problems.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
