Hi Pierre-Louis > >> That said, do we want to preclude it? at some point we probably want > >> to get rid of the FE/BE distinction and have 'domains' that can be > >> chained. So it may not be a good thing to cast a restriction in > >> stone. If at some point we need a list of upstream/downstream clients > >> maybe we should keep this. > > > > Yeah, "domains" is nice idea !! > > > > But, before that, I think we need to cleanup soc-pcm. > > I'm reading it, but it is too much complex, and too unreadable... > > I want to cleanup it first. I believe it can help > > the conversion (= FE/BE to domains). > > The idea of domains/constraint propagation is not mine BTW, it was > presented by Lars some 2-3 years ago. there may be a note somewhere in > the audio miniconference minutes. Yes, I guess it was ELC-E. My work (*) is to helpping him/his idea. (*) No categorize CPU/Codec/Platfrom modern style dai_link soc-core / soc-pcm cleanup (on going) (Semi) multi CPU support (will post) (Semi) no categorize CPU/Codec DAI (will post) Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
