Hi Pierre-Louis Thank you for your feedback > It is my understanding that the current code would not support a case > where a FE is also a BE. > > That said, do we want to preclude it? at some point we probably want > to get rid of the FE/BE distinction and have 'domains' that can be > chained. So it may not be a good thing to cast a restriction in > stone. If at some point we need a list of upstream/downstream clients > maybe we should keep this. Yeah, "domains" is nice idea !! But, before that, I think we need to cleanup soc-pcm. I'm reading it, but it is too much complex, and too unreadable... I want to cleanup it first. I believe it can help the conversion (= FE/BE to domains). Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
