On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 12:05:07 +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2019, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > The doubly unlock sequence at snd_seq_client_ioctl_unlock() is tricky. > > I took a direct unref call since I thought it would avoid > > misunderstanding, but rather this seems more confusing. Let's use > > snd_seq_client_unlock() consistently even if they look strange to be > > called twice, and add more comments for avoiding reader's confusion. > > > > Fixes: 6b580f523172 ("ALSA: seq: Protect racy pool manipulation from OSS sequencer") > > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > sound/core/seq/seq_clientmgr.c | 7 ++++++- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > thanks, looks good now (this and rest of the clean-up series): > Reviewed-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel