On Mon, 01 Apr 2019 19:26:13 +0200, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > On 3/29/19 8:30 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > On 3/28/19 6:08 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 02:21:47PM -0400, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > >>>>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_EDISON) > >>>>> > >>>>> Can we use Merrifield / mrfld instead of EDISON in entire series? > >>> > >>> we could, but I don't know of any other platform than Edison to run the > >>> code. I know it's less accurate from an architecture perspective > >>> but felt > >>> Merrifield was confusing for non-Intel folks. > >> > >> We use Merrifield across the entire kernel. It would be confusing > >> other way around. > >> So, please, change it to be consistent with the rest of the kernel. > > > > Since this is the only comment so far, I'll add a follow-up patch. > > Discard this reply, I'll address this in an update to address > Takashi's comments as well. > > > Actually I need feedback from reviewers/maintainers: I could either > provide an update addressing just comments from Andy and Takashi, or > provide a larger update that would include known fixes and > simplifications from SOF contributors on github, e.g. on the IPC. We > have about 15-20 delta patches that were accepted on github, not sure > what the preference is, just addressing comments so far or getting the > latest and greatest patches squashed? IMO, one or two more whole patchset refresh would be still worth. Then we can merge the base, and go for refinement with each small change, hopefully in this merge cycle. For the resubmission, please give me a bit more time. I had no time for further review in the last week due to completely other businesses (the office room movement, etc)... thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
