Hi Morimoto-san
thanks for your comments
On 2019/03/13 15:23, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
Hi Jiada
Some of SoCs have both basic and extended dmac registers set
basic set only supports busif0 ~ busif3, in order to use
busif4 ~ busif7, extended audio dmac registers need to be used.
This patch changes to use extended dmac registers set when it is
available in device-tree.
Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
1st of all, if you want to post this kind of patch-set,
you *should* post driver side patch 1st, and if it was accepted,
you need to post SoC side patch. Then, you need to indicate
to SoC maintainer which branch/commit should be based.
Otherwise, it will 100% breaks git-bisect.
yes, you're right,
sorry about this
2nd, in my understanding, our conclusion at Renesas-ML
is that we don't need to think about basic/extend DMAC register.
Because extend area is 100% covering basic area.
In other words, it is compatible.
Driver side don't need to think about it.
I am a little confused,
because latest comment received from simon, suggests to let driver to
decide which register set to use.
for me, I think it's not necessary, if extended register set is available,
driver shall always use it.
Thanks,
Jiada
--- a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/dma.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/dma.c
@@ -830,7 +830,10 @@ int rsnd_dma_probe(struct rsnd_priv *priv)
/*
* for Gen2 or later
*/
- res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "audmapp");
+ res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "extaudmapp");
+ if (!res)
+ res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
+ "audmapp");
dmac = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dmac), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dmac || !res) {
dev_err(dev, "dma allocate failed\n");
--
2.19.2
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
