On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 02:29:57PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 02:18:01PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > as discussed in the last review, we didn't use min() since it adds a number > > of obscure warnings with sparse. I haven't found any time to look into this > > so for now left the code as is. Sparse is a useful tool for the address > > checks (topology/DMAs with _le32, __iomem, etc), the fewer warnings we get > > the better. > Shouldn't be sparse itself get fixed? Ideally. We had this discussion last time :/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
