Sounds like a great plan, Takashi! Yes, relationship between 'The Bit' and Eratech is very unclear... the best I was able to find by searching around is that head of R&D at 'The Bit' seems to have been CEO of Eratech in the past... Thank you! -- Olek On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 1:40 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 19:30:03 +0100, > Olek Poplavsky wrote: > > > > Thank you for your response, Takashi! > > > > Yes, the patch you are suggesting will work as well, it was actually > > the first patch I tried. Both ways I was able to use native DSD > > capability of my DAP/DAC. > > The reason I went with more 'targeted' patch is that I am not sure if > > 0x10cb is describing a family of similar devices, like 0x20b1 > > describes XMOS. > > In cases like this I prefer to err on the side of caution, and > > generalize only when there are two or three cases known to be in the > > same family. > > OK, 10cb seems to be Eratech, which doesn't match with the vendor of > your actual device. It might be OK to put in the whitelist, but maybe > at this time we can put to the explicit quirk entry. > > But then we should mark it to be whitelist-able, in case we'd want to > move to there. > > I'll apply your patch with the update of the comment indicating it. > > > thanks, > > Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
