On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 19:30:03 +0100, Olek Poplavsky wrote: > > Thank you for your response, Takashi! > > Yes, the patch you are suggesting will work as well, it was actually > the first patch I tried. Both ways I was able to use native DSD > capability of my DAP/DAC. > The reason I went with more 'targeted' patch is that I am not sure if > 0x10cb is describing a family of similar devices, like 0x20b1 > describes XMOS. > In cases like this I prefer to err on the side of caution, and > generalize only when there are two or three cases known to be in the > same family. OK, 10cb seems to be Eratech, which doesn't match with the vendor of your actual device. It might be OK to put in the whitelist, but maybe at this time we can put to the explicit quirk entry. But then we should mark it to be whitelist-able, in case we'd want to move to there. I'll apply your patch with the update of the comment indicating it. thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
