On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 7:33 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I can apply the patch via merge, so bothering with this is not at all > > necessary, but if this change is useful, perhaps it's worth submitting > > another patch for it. I doubt this though, as it looks a bit hackish > > to me. > > It's useful (that's a genuine issue) but it shouldn't be bodged by TDM > mode but should instead just be done as standard without the machine > driver needing to do TDM - check if the clock rate required is actually > generated then fall back to a less exact frame if that helps. That way > everyone gets the benefit without needing custom configuration or code. > Basically it's doing the right thing in terms of configuring the > hardware but should be triggered differently. I suspected as much; I'll need to read up a bit on clocking though if I'm going to give this a shot. I'll be away from my computer during the holidays so, if time permits, I'll give it a try with the new year and open a new thread if I need feedback. Thanks again for all your help so far. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel