Re: [PATCH v3 08/14] ASoC: SOF: Add DSP HW abstraction operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/11/18 5:16 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 03:23:12PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
From: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Add operation pointers that can be called by core to control a wide
variety of DSP targets. The DSP HW drivers will fill in these
operations.
+int snd_sof_pci_update_bits_unlocked(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u32 offset,
+				     u32 mask, u32 value)
+{
+	bool change;
+	unsigned int old, new;
+	u32 ret = ~0; /* explicit init to remove uninitialized use warnings */
+
+	pci_read_config_dword(sdev->pci, offset, &ret);
+	dev_dbg(sdev->dev, "Debug PCIR: %8.8x at  %8.8x\n",
+		pci_read_config_dword(sdev->pci, offset, &ret), offset);
+
+	old = ret;
+	new = (old & (~mask)) | (value & mask);
+
+	change = (old != new);
+	if (change) {
+		pci_write_config_dword(sdev->pci, offset, new);
+		dev_dbg(sdev->dev, "Debug PCIW: %8.8x at  %8.8x\n", value,
+			offset);
+	}
+
+	return change;
What about dropping change completely?

if (old == new)
	return false;

...
return true;
ok for all cases


+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_sof_pci_update_bits_unlocked);
+int snd_sof_dsp_update_bits_unlocked(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u32 bar,
+				     u32 offset, u32 mask, u32 value)
+{
+	bool change;
+	unsigned int old, new;
+	u32 ret;
+
+	ret = snd_sof_dsp_read(sdev, bar, offset);
+
+	old = ret;
+	new = (old & (~mask)) | (value & mask);
+
+	change = (old != new);
+	if (change)
+		snd_sof_dsp_write(sdev, bar, offset, new);
+
+	return change;
Ditto.
Everywhere in similar places.

+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_sof_dsp_update_bits_unlocked);
+	/* check if set state successful */
+	for (time = 5; time > 0; time--) {
+		if ((snd_sof_dsp_read(sdev, bar, offset) & mask) == target)
+			break;
+		msleep(20);
+	}
+
+	if (!time) {
+		/* sleeping in 10ms steps so adjust timeout value */
+		timeout /= 10;
+
+		for (time = timeout; time > 0; time--) {
+			if ((snd_sof_dsp_read(sdev, bar, offset) & mask) ==
+				target)
I would leave it on one line.
ok

+				break;
+
+			usleep_range(5000, 10000);
+		}
+	}
+
+	ret = time ? 0 : -ETIME;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_sof_dsp_register_poll);
+static inline void snd_sof_dsp_write64(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u32 bar,
+				       u32 offset, u64 value)
+{
+	if (sdev->ops->write64)
+		sdev->ops->write64(sdev,
+			sdev->bar[bar] + offset, value);
Why not one line?
ok

+}

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux