Re: [PATCH - Intervals v2 1/1] interval: Interpret (x x+1] correctly and return x+1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:19:28 +0200,
Timo Wischer wrote:
> 
> On 10/18/18 20:57, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > But how can it be at the first place?  (352 353) is already empty as
> > the frames.  The time could be kept in this representation, but the
> > frames must be integer.
> >
> > Which order of calls did it result in so?
> >
> > We know that some order of calls make the selection impossible like
> > the above, especially when both time and bytes/frames are mixed.
> 
> 
> I have used the following ALSA configuration:
> 
> pcm.test_rate {
>     type rate
>         slave.pcm hw:gmdcard
>         slave.rate 48000
> }

And which driver is gmdcard?


Takashi
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel




[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux