On 10/3/18 8:34 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> >> You are correct. It does not trigger a warning. >> >> There are about 50 similar instances in the whole codebase. And, as they >> are just a few, what I'm trying to do is to replace them with the most >> commonly used form: "fall through" > > Hm, then I'm not sure whether it's worth for further similar > replacements. A term "fallthru" is also very commonly used, and the > compiler knows it, too, so why bother to rewrite? > Not that common actually. There are more than 2000 instances of "fall through" and just ~50 of "fallthru" and ~40 of "fall thru" > I don't mean to revert the already applied changes, but maybe better > to concentrate on fixing other real bugs (and/or real warnings). > Yeah. Sure thing. It's just that I sort of ran into those cases a few days ago. Thanks -- Gustavo _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
