On 10/3/18 6:19 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 18:08:07 +0200, > Takashi Iwai wrote: >> >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 12:38:36 +0200, >> Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >>> >>> Replace "fallthru" with a proper "fall through" annotation. >>> >>> This fix is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling >>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Thanks, applied. > > BTW, does "fallthru" really cause a warning? I thought it's also > accepted as well as "fall-through". At least, my gcc-8 doesn't give a > warning with "fallthru". > You are correct. It does not trigger a warning. There are about 50 similar instances in the whole codebase. And, as they are just a few, what I'm trying to do is to replace them with the most commonly used form: "fall through" Thanks -- Gustavo _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
