On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 07:30:16AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > OTOH, if the CPU dai can really provide a dynamic value that is > strictly tied with pointer, CPU dai itself should provide the pointer > callback that covers both the pointer and the base delay, and it > should be used instead of component pointer callback. Probably anything in the SoC would be potentially able to get a dynamic value out - the main issue for off SoC devices is the cost of getting to the data but that's not an issue when you're memory mapped.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel