On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 05:32:21PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > That said, if delay callback of CPU dai provides the additional delay, > the patch does correct thing. OTOH, if CPU dai provides the base > delay instead, we need to clarify that it's rather a must; the delay > calculation in pointer callback becomes bogus in this scenario. Part of the theory here is that every component might have a delay independently of the rest and we need to add them all together to figure out what the system as a whole will see. Personally I'd rather just have everything use a callack consistently to avoid confusion.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel