On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 02:49:05PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Although I agree that ideally we would be able to get all this > directly from the firmware, to me fixing the x86 specific problem > of that info missing using quirks in the Intel machine driver seems > like the right place to fix this, so that we are not "poluting" > generic code with these Intel specific workarounds. Yeah, my feeling here is that this is less pollution than you're seeing it as - it's too much like endorsement of the Windows one driver per machine way of doing things and splits the knowledge about how the device gets used about more. Purely a taste question.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
