Hi Mark Thank you for your feedback > > Codec / CPU callback order are OK, but DAI / Component order is exchanged. > > If this is not a big problem, we can do it. > > Ah, yes - we'd need to mix in the platform :/ (snip) > Yes, there's other things need to be fixed - I'm not saying it'd be a > simple transition. (snip) > It's been talked about for years but it's another of these things that's > a lot of work to transition. Hmm... OK... So, we have 2 choices ? choice 1) Use ordered DAI - We need to select all DAI / Component callback order somehow (I think every callback can use same order ?). - SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBx_CFx exchanged is mandatory - DAI categorize is no longer needed. choice 2) Use categorized DAI - DAI categorize is still needed. - SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBx_CFx exchanged is not mandatory I think choice 2) is good for step-by-step approach ;) I think, we can use "1 dai_link approach style" on choice 2) anyway. And it can use "ordered DAI" approach style too. It doesn't include "component order", but good step for "choice 1)" ? If I use "CPU/Codec" naming here, we will have multi CPU DAI, and multi Codec DAI. Then, we can know num_cpu_dai, num_codec_dai. 1 ordered dai_link will be dai_link = CPU0, CPU1, ... Codec0, Codec1, ... we can know which one is CPU/Codec DAI by using num_cpu/codec_dai. Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
