From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The functions slim_ack_txn and slim_alloc_txbuf are local to the
source and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static.
Cleans up sparse warnings:
symbol 'slim_ack_txn' was not declared. Should it be static?
symbol 'slim_alloc_txbuf' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/slimbus/qcom-ctrl.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/slimbus/qcom-ctrl.c b/drivers/slimbus/qcom-ctrl.c
index 9b7846f1f8c3..f24293a8aea8 100644
--- a/drivers/slimbus/qcom-ctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/slimbus/qcom-ctrl.c
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static void *slim_alloc_rxbuf(struct qcom_slim_ctrl *ctrl)
return ctrl->rx.base + (idx * ctrl->rx.sl_sz);
}
-void slim_ack_txn(struct qcom_slim_ctrl *ctrl, int err)
+static void slim_ack_txn(struct qcom_slim_ctrl *ctrl, int err)
{
struct completion *comp;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -301,8 +301,9 @@ static int qcom_clk_pause_wakeup(struct slim_controller *sctrl)
return 0;
}
-void *slim_alloc_txbuf(struct qcom_slim_ctrl *ctrl, struct slim_msg_txn *txn,
- struct completion *done)
+static void *slim_alloc_txbuf(struct qcom_slim_ctrl *ctrl,
+ struct slim_msg_txn *txn,
+ struct completion *done)
{
unsigned long flags;
int idx;
--
2.14.1
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
