On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:49:50PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Maybe the good thing to do is to actaully leave the nuc900 code alone > instead of trying to change something that never failed and that doesn't > seem to interest anyone anymore (else the platform would have been > converted to DT). > I don't know. The bug is less than a month old and this discussion has been useful for me as I review any platform_get_irq() changes sent to staging. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
