Arvind,
This was v5 and it contains an error that was corrected between v1 and
v2. For whatever reason, you reintroduced it between v4 and v5.
This is wasting a lot of time.
On 09/12/2017 at 19:03:56 +0530, arvindY wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Saturday 09 December 2017 05:22 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The error handling doesn't work here because "nuc900_audio->irq_num" is
> > unsigned. Also we should be checking for < 0 and not <= 0 but I believe
> > that's harmless. The platform_get_irq() comments don't talk about the
> > return values...
> Sorry for this patch. I will fix it and send you updated patch.
> Thanks for point it.
> > Fixes: fa8cc38165c2 ("ASoC: nuc900: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c b/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
> > index 5e4fbd2d3479..71fce7c85c93 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
> > @@ -345,11 +345,10 @@ static int nuc900_ac97_drvprobe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > goto out;
> > }
> > - nuc900_audio->irq_num = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > - if (nuc900_audio->irq_num <= 0) {
> > - ret = nuc900_audio->irq_num < 0 ? nuc900_audio->irq_num : -EBUSY;
> > + ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + if (ret < 0)
The <= 0 was ok, see:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/18/41
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
