On 12/7/17 6:27 AM, Ughreja, Rakesh A wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Koul, Vinod
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 9:48 PM
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ughreja, Rakesh A <rakesh.a.ughreja@xxxxxxxxx>; alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; tiwai@xxxxxxx; liam.r.girdwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Patches
Audio <patches.audio@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/10] ASoC: Intel: Boards: Machine driver for Intel
platforms
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 09:37:37AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 12/4/17 9:10 AM, Ughreja, Rakesh A wrote:
sound/soc/intel/boards/Kconfig | 10 ++
sound/soc/intel/boards/Makefile | 2 +
sound/soc/intel/boards/skl_hda_generic.c | 276
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
can we drop the Skylake reference? It's become a catch-all term to mean
both the platform, the IP and the driver.
Suggest some name. I have no problem.
HiFi3 ?
iDisp ?
HDAudio-DSP ?
hda_dsp_generic.c -- For the main file
hda_dsp_common.c -- for common functions
Does it look fine ?
works for me.
Sorry not for me. hda_dsp_xxx doesnt tie it to anything. HDA and DSP are too
generic terms. But yes I don't have a better alternate than skl_generic.
Here this solution is tied to a very specfic IP which is present in SKL
onwards platforms..
Yes SKL is become an IP as well as platform. Maybe we should have a codename
for this like azx :)
We do have a code name "sst".
So does this sound okay for you ?
sst_hda_dsp_generic.c -- For main file
sst_hda_dsp_common.c -- for common functions
SST is also aliased to platform drivers with closed-source firmware, not
a good idea for machine drivers.
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
