>-----Original Message----- >From: Koul, Vinod >Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 9:48 PM >To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Cc: Ughreja, Rakesh A <rakesh.a.ughreja@xxxxxxxxx>; alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; tiwai@xxxxxxx; liam.r.girdwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Patches >Audio <patches.audio@xxxxxxxxx> >Subject: Re: [RFC 01/10] ASoC: Intel: Boards: Machine driver for Intel >platforms > >On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 09:37:37AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: >> On 12/4/17 9:10 AM, Ughreja, Rakesh A wrote: > >> >>>>> sound/soc/intel/boards/Kconfig | 10 ++ >> >>>>> sound/soc/intel/boards/Makefile | 2 + >> >>>>> sound/soc/intel/boards/skl_hda_generic.c | 276 >> >>>>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >>>> >> >>>>can we drop the Skylake reference? It's become a catch-all term to mean >> >>>>both the platform, the IP and the driver. >> >>> >> >>>Suggest some name. I have no problem. >> >> >> >>HiFi3 ? >> >>iDisp ? >> >>HDAudio-DSP ? >> > >> >hda_dsp_generic.c -- For the main file >> >hda_dsp_common.c -- for common functions >> > >> >Does it look fine ? >> >> works for me. > >Sorry not for me. hda_dsp_xxx doesnt tie it to anything. HDA and DSP are too >generic terms. But yes I don't have a better alternate than skl_generic. >Here this solution is tied to a very specfic IP which is present in SKL >onwards platforms.. > >Yes SKL is become an IP as well as platform. Maybe we should have a codename >for this like azx :) We do have a code name "sst". So does this sound okay for you ? sst_hda_dsp_generic.c -- For main file sst_hda_dsp_common.c -- for common functions Regards, Rakesh > >-- >~Vinod _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
