Hi,
On Monday 20 November 2017 07:07 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 19/11/2017 at 09:45:00 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@xxxxxxxxx>
---
changes in v2 :
irq was unsigned. so changed it to signed.
changes in v3 :
Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ0 is not valid.
changes in v4 :
Return -ENODEV insted of irq.
To ensure this doesn't get applied: platform_get_irq can return
-EPROBE_DEFER and this must be handled properly.
(Or maybe this has never caused anything and never failed at all and
nobody cares).
Yes, you are right. We should retry to get an irq for device. But ASoC
driver is not retrying. if platfore_get_irq() fail here, Driver is
throwing an error.
and this patch is only to fix error checking which is not correct in
Driver.
~arvind
sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
index bbf7a92..efeecee 100644
--- a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
+++ b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct ep93xx_ac97_info *info;
struct resource *res;
- unsigned int irq;
+ int irq;
int ret;
info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return PTR_ERR(info->regs);
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
- if (!irq)
+ if (irq <= 0)
return -ENODEV;
ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ep93xx_ac97_interrupt,
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
