On 19/11/2017 at 09:45:00 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
> for zero is not correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> changes in v2 :
> irq was unsigned. so changed it to signed.
> changes in v3 :
> Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ0 is not valid.
> changes in v4 :
> Return -ENODEV insted of irq.
>
To ensure this doesn't get applied: platform_get_irq can return
-EPROBE_DEFER and this must be handled properly.
(Or maybe this has never caused anything and never failed at all and
nobody cares).
> sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
> index bbf7a92..efeecee 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct ep93xx_ac97_info *info;
> struct resource *res;
> - unsigned int irq;
> + int irq;
> int ret;
>
> info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(info->regs);
>
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (!irq)
> + if (irq <= 0)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ep93xx_ac97_interrupt,
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
