Re: [PATCH 4/8] ASoC: AMD: added condition checks for CZ specific code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:35:02PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:

> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>


> index dcbf997..e48ae5d 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/amd/acp-pcm-dma.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/amd/acp-pcm-dma.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
>  
>  #define MAX_BUFFER (PLAYBACK_MAX_PERIOD_SIZE * PLAYBACK_MAX_NUM_PERIODS)
>  #define MIN_BUFFER MAX_BUFFER
> +#define CHIP_STONEY 14
> +#define CHIP_CARRIZO 13

These defines are being added in the middle of a file but CHIP_STONEY is
also used in another file in the previous patch (and apparently
extensively throughout the DRM driver already).  This is obviously not
good, we shouldn't have multiple copies of the definition.

> -	} else {
> +		if (adata->asic_type == CHIP_CARRIZO) {
> +			for (bank = 1; bank <= 4; bank++)
> +				acp_set_sram_bank_state(adata->acp_mmio, bank,
> +				false);

I'm not seeing any poweroff cases for other chips being added, and again
switch statements please.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux