On May 3 2017 22:54, Adam Thomson wrote: > In the SRM lock check section of code the '&' bitwise operator is > used as part of checking lock status. Functionally the code works > as intended, but the conditional statement is a boolean comparison > so should really use '&&' logical operator instead. This commit > rectifies this discrepancy. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Reviewed-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c b/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c > index d256ebf..6e1940e 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c > @@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ static int da7218_dai_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w, > ++i; > msleep(DA7218_SRM_CHECK_DELAY); > } > - } while ((i < DA7218_SRM_CHECK_TRIES) & (!success)); > + } while ((i < DA7218_SRM_CHECK_TRIES) && (!success)); > > if (!success) > dev_warn(codec->dev, "SRM failed to lock\n"); Would you please fix codes for da7213, too? Regards Takashi Sakamoto _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
