On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > While in general DMI_SYS_VENDOR is commonly used, there are exceptions to > the rule, such as the very machine I am working on at the moment which does > have any useful DMI_SYS_VENDOR information (see below) > Mengdong may be able to comment on why we took this direction. In a DMI database of 113 PC models that we have worked with here: 112 have correct/meaningful sys_vendor, 1 is useless (To be filled by OEM) 106 have correct board_vendor, 7 have incorrect or useless values And awkwardly the one system that I'd like to match in UCM rules here has correct sys_vendor but bad board_vendor. Daniel _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
