On 04/27/2017 03:13 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart
<pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not sure if we can really limit the conventions to type1 or type2 if we want
the names to be somewhat meaningful.
I can't recall why we selected DMI_BOARD_VENDOR instead of DMI_SYS_VENDOR
though.
Is it too late to change to DMI_SYS_VENDOR? Or to have both present in
the string?
While in general DMI_SYS_VENDOR is commonly used, there are exceptions
to the rule, such as the very machine I am working on at the moment
which does have any useful DMI_SYS_VENDOR information (see below)
Mengdong may be able to comment on why we took this direction.
Handle 0x0001, DMI type 1, 27 bytes
System Information
Manufacturer:
Product Name:
Version:
Serial Number:
UUID: 6DD3E1A2-7A70-41FC-917A-231C2C4E2E4E
Wake-up Type: Power Switch
SKU Number:
Family:
Handle 0x0002, DMI type 2, 15 bytes
Base Board Information
Manufacturer: Intel Corporation
Product Name: NUC6i7KYB
Version: H90766-405
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
