On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 06:10:49PM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote: > Using regmap_update_bits(..., mask, 1) with 'mask' following (1 << k) > and k greater than 0 is wrong. Indeed, _regmap_update_bits will perform > (mask & 1), which results in 0 if LSB of mask is 0. Thus the call > regmap_update_bits(..., mask, 1) is in reality equivalent to > regmap_update_bits(..., mask, 0). > > In such a case, the correct use is regmap_update_bits(..., mask, mask). > > This driver is performing such a mistake with the CS42L56_AIN*_REF_MASK > masks, which equal 0x10, 0x20, 0x40 and 0x80. Fix the driver to make it > consistent with the API. Please note that this change is untested, > as I do not have this piece of hardware. Testers are welcome! > > Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- Looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Charles _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel