On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:13:10AM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > > This part I agree. Unfortunately this was not done transparently... > > > > > b) the source file should have been renamed to match, if the name "crec" > > > is a massive problem then it should also be a problem that > > > "cplay.c->cplay" but "crec.c->crecord". If it's ok to have the source > > > file called crec.c what's wrong with the binary it builds being called > > > crec? > > > > I dont mind renaming source as well.. > > > > I think bigger question is should we continue crec or crecord, my preference > > is latter. > > > > > c) it's a nuisance to have to change existing test systems and apps that > > > launch "crec", or to create symlinks from crec->crecord. > > > > Yeah agree, lets decide on one and stick to that, forever hopefully :) > > > > Ok let's change to crecord for consistency with arecord, and I'll do a > patch to rename the source to match. Sounds good :) -- ~Vinod _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
