On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 01:33:47AM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: > In you patch 5/5 there is backtrace with flat cache, but I meant a > backtrace with original RB tree cache code when warning about allocation > being done in atomic context was generated. I think the conclusion of this and some IRC discussion yesterday is that removing patch 5 fixes things - is that right?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
