On Aug 9 2016 21:24, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> You completely puzzled me. Finally, what you'd like me to do????? > > You've cut into too small patches. Damn too small. > > Of course, too small is much better than too big. That's why I wrote > "it's OK". But it's also a bad taste, after all -- it annoys readers, > since they need to look over the same boring changes again and again. > > For avoiding annoyance, such tasks would be better to be grouped in a > certain level, so that readers can take a glance over wider ranges, as > long as all the changes are the more or less same procedure. And bisect operations have a practical effect. Hm, OK. I see. Depending on the purpose of patches, I'm likely to create large patches. Honestly, I have a long concern about the granularity of the size of each patch. For example, change log of the latest alsa-lib in alsa-project.org is quite bad and I was a bit disappointed. Regards Takashi Sakamoto _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
