On Aug 9 2016 00:07, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 10:37:21 +0200, > Takashi Sakamoto wrote: >> >> On Aug 8 2016 16:04, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>> On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 11:48:47 +0200, >>> Takashi Sakamoto wrote: >>>> >>>> In former commit, actual operations of each ioctl command get argument >>>> in kernel space. Copying from/to user space is performed outside of >>>> the function. >>>> >>>> This commit optimizes to the new design. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> While it's OK to split to small patches if you prefer, you don't have >>> to do so. Basically all the rest are doing the same thing (strip >>> copy_*_user() and replace to the pointer accesses), and it's rather >>> boring to read repeated mails. >> >> The mail server of alsa-project.org has a limitation of the size of >> one message. It shrinks developers to split commit to a small >> parts. Not from my taste. > > Yeah, that's sometimes annoying, indeed. Jaroslav, could you raise > the bar to allow larger patches, or drop this restriction? It's not what I want. I've already followed to the restriction for this several years. The restriction is still OK as long as I can split my patches as small parts and I'm not objected for them. You completely puzzled me. Finally, what you'd like me to do????? Regards Takashi Sakamoto _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel