On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 15:26 +0800, Garlic Tseng wrote: > Modify mt8173 driver implementation to use common structure. > > Signed-off-by: Garlic Tseng <garlic.tseng@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig | 11 + > sound/soc/mediatek/Makefile | 3 +- > sound/soc/mediatek/common/Makefile | 17 + > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-common.h | 42 +- > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c | 679 +++++++++++--------------- > 5 files changed, 327 insertions(+), 425 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/common/Makefile > > diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig b/sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig > index ae9f664..ff1a419 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig > +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig > @@ -1,6 +1,16 @@ > +config SND_SOC_MEDIATEK > + tristate "SND_SOC_MEDIATEK" > + depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK > + help > + This adds ASoC driver for Mediatek boards > + that can be used with other codecs. > + Select Y if you have such device. > + If unsure select "N". > + > config SND_SOC_MT8173 > tristate "ASoC support for Mediatek MT8173 chip" > depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK > + select SND_SOC_MEDIATEK > help > This adds ASoC platform driver support for Mediatek MT8173 chip > that can be used with other codecs. It seems both SND_SOC_MT8173 and SND_SOC_MT2701 select SND_SOC_MEDIATEK, and enabling only SND_SOC_MEDIATEK itself is not really useful. Do we need to make SND_SOC_MEDIATEK user configurable option? If it is, we should at least have a proper config prompt instead of just "SND_SOC_MEDIATEK". > @@ -49,3 +59,4 @@ config SND_SOC_MT8173_RT5650_RT5676 > with the RT5650 and RT5676 codecs. > Select Y if you have such device. > If unsure select "N". > + nit: This change is not necessary. Joe.C _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
